Gila – Colorado River Steamships

The Gila was a wooden-hulled stern-wheel steamboat (sternwheeler) of the Colorado Steam Navigation Company that operated on the lower Colorado River from 1873 to 1899. It was one of the most durable and successful vessels in the river’s steamboat era, known for its shallow draft that allowed it to navigate the river’s shifting sandbars, low water, and difficult stretches while carrying freight, passengers, mining equipment, and supplies.

Gila Steamboat at the Yuma Crossing Arizona, 1873.
Gila Steamboat at the Yuma Crossing Arizona, 1873.

Description and Specifications

The Gila measured approximately 149 feet in length with a 31-foot beam and a hull depth of about 3.5–3.8 feet. It displaced 236 tons and drew only about 16.5 inches of water when light (unloaded), making it exceptionally well-suited to the Colorado’s shallow, variable conditions. Cargo capacity was typically around 125 tons, and it frequently towed barges that significantly increased overall payload.

It was a classic Western river sternwheeler: a flat-bottomed or lightly built wooden hull powered by a stern paddlewheel, optimized for maneuvering in confined channels and over bars rather than for open-water speed or deep draft. Passenger accommodations included staterooms (limited in number) and a dining area, though conditions were often harsh due to extreme desert heat. Contemporary accounts, such as Martha Summerhayes’s description of an 1874 voyage under Captain Jack Mellon, note the intense heat that made staterooms nearly unusable during the day, forced passengers to sleep on deck at night with straw bedding, and left even metal utensils uncomfortably warm. Meals were basic (biscuits, salted beef, canned vegetables), and drinking water was cooled only marginally by hanging flannel-covered canteens in the shade.

The boat was built in San Francisco by shipbuilder Patrick Henry Tiernan, shipped “knocked down” (disassembled) to Port Isabel, Sonora (near the Colorado River’s mouth on the Gulf of California), and reassembled and launched there in January 1873 under the supervision of veteran Captain David C. Robinson. It was constructed specifically as a replacement for the aging Nina Tilden, an earlier vessel acquired by George Alonzo Johnson’s interests after the failure of a rival company.

Historical Context of Colorado River Steamboating

Steamboat navigation on the Colorado began in the early 1850s primarily to supply the isolated U.S. Army post at Fort Yuma (near the Gila River confluence). Overland freight from California was extremely expensive (often hundreds of dollars per ton). Early side-wheelers such as the Uncle Sam (1852) and General Jesup demonstrated the feasibility of river transport; later sternwheelers with shallower drafts proved far more practical. The Colorado Steam Navigation Company (and its predecessors under George A. Johnson) dominated the trade, establishing woodyards along the river (often worked by Cocopah laborers) so boats could refuel overnight rather than gather wood en route. Boats did not run at night because of the constant hazards of shifting sandbars and snags.

By the 1860s–1870s the route extended from the delta (Port Isabel and earlier landings) past Yuma/Arizona City upriver to points such as Ehrenberg, Hardyville, Fort Mohave, and eventually farther north during high water or special voyages. Freight included mining machinery, coal, supplies, and merchandise inbound, and ore, wool, hides, and other products outbound. Passenger fares varied by distance.

Service History of the Gila

Launched in early 1873, the Gila quickly became a workhorse of the fleet. It hauled freight and passengers on the main lower-river routes for more than 25 years and was frequently commanded by skilled pilots, notably Captain John “Jack” Alexander Mellon (sometimes spelled Melon or Mellon). Mellon had extensive experience on the river and was known for innovative techniques such as using the sternwheel to dig through sandbars when necessary.

A notable chapter began in 1879 after the Southern Pacific Railroad interests acquired control of the steamboat company. The Gila was chartered to Joseph Wharton, who had consolidated mining operations in Eldorado Canyon (Nevada). Under Mellon’s command it delivered machinery to the canyon and then, in a pioneering voyage in July 1879, successfully navigated the previously uncharted Boulder Canyon to reach the mouth of the Virgin River at Rioville (Utah/Nevada border area). This proved that the Virgin River confluence was the practical head of steam navigation on the Colorado—something earlier explorers and operators (including Johnson, Ives, and Trueworthy) had believed possible but had not fully achieved. Over the next eight years the Gila made about 22 trips up to Rioville to obtain salt needed for processing silver ore at the Eldorado Canyon mills.

Throughout its career the boat supported the region’s mining booms, military posts, and settlements. It operated in an era when steamboats were the most economical way to move heavy goods into the arid Southwest until railroads progressively undercut the trade (Southern Pacific reached Yuma in 1877, and later lines further reduced river traffic).

Ports of Call and Route

Operations typically began at the Colorado River Delta/Gulf of California area (transferring cargo from ocean vessels to avoid Mexican duties or navigate shallow tidal waters) and ran upstream through Sonora, Baja California Territory, California, Arizona Territory, and into Nevada. Key landings and ports associated with the Gila and the broader fleet included:

  • Port Isabel / estuary area (Sonora, Mexico): Assembly/launch site and southern terminal; early ocean-to-river transfer point.
  • Yuma (Arizona City / Fort Yuma area): Primary hub, shipyard/repair site after the 1870s, and major transfer point. The Gila is documented there frequently (including with barges).
  • Castle Dome Landing: About 35 miles above Yuma; served the Castle Dome mining district (lead ore, smelting).
  • Ehrenberg (earlier Mineral City) and nearby La Paz / Olive City: Major mid-river ports roughly 125–130 miles above Yuma; key for central Arizona freight and passengers connecting to stage/wagon roads inland. Regular stops for the Gila and sister boats.
  • Aubrey, Parker’s Landing, and intermediate woodyards/ranches: Wood fuel stops and minor landings.
  • Fort Mohave / Hardyville (later near Bullhead City area): Important northern low-water head of navigation (~310 miles above Yuma); ferry and freight transfer for northern Arizona and mines. The Gila made regular runs here.
  • Polhamus Landing (near Hardyville, established ~1881): Busy freight point in the early 1880s for mines and agencies.
  • Eldorado Canyon area (Nevada): Mining support, machinery delivery, and ore/bullion transport.
  • Callville: Mormon-founded landing; intermediate stop on upper runs.
  • Rioville (also associated with Bonelli’s Ferry; at the Virgin River confluence, now under Lake Mead): High-water head of navigation (~440 miles from Yuma/Fort Yuma area). The Gila reached it repeatedly 1879–1887 for salt cargoes.

Other occasional or fleet-associated stops included various woodyards, Drift Desert, California Camp, and points serving Indian agencies or temporary mining camps. Upstream travel was slower and more hazardous (days to a week or more depending on water levels and destination); downstream was faster with the current. High water (spring snowmelt) enabled farther upstream travel; low water restricted boats to shallower-draft operations and lower landings.

The Gila exemplified the ingenuity required to make commercial steamboating viable on one of the West’s most challenging rivers. Its long service life and role in extending navigation to the Virgin River marked it as a standout vessel in the Colorado River steamboat era.

Fate and Legacy

After roughly 25–35 years of continuous hard service (sources vary slightly on the exact phrasing of longevity), the worn Gila was rebuilt in 1899 at Yuma. Its machinery was refurbished and installed in a new or heavily reconstructed hull launched as the Cochan (sometimes given as 135 feet long with similar beam and a still-shallow draft). The Cochan continued working the river into the early 1900s, including support for Imperial Valley projects, until commercial steam navigation effectively ended with the completion of Laguna Dam (about 14 miles above Yuma) in 1909, which blocked the channel. Residual river traffic continued on a limited basis for a few more years.

The Gila is remembered as one of the most durable and capable boats on the Colorado—outlasting many contemporaries and playing a key role in extending reliable navigation northward and supporting the mining and settlement economy of the lower Colorado River corridor during its peak steamboat decades. Photographs from the period show it tied up at Yuma and other landings, often alongside barges that served as floating docks or additional cargo capacity.

Hoover Dam

Hoover Damn Bypass seen from the top with Hoover Damn. Photo by James L Rathbun
Hoover Damn Bypass seen from the top with Hoover Damn. Photo by James L Rathbun

Hoover Dam (originally authorized as Boulder Dam or the Boulder Canyon Project) is a concrete arch-gravity dam in Black Canyon on the Colorado River, on the Arizona–Nevada border about 30 miles southeast of Las Vegas. Built between 1931 and 1936 during the Great Depression, it stands 726.4 feet high, stretches 1,244 feet along its crest, is 660 feet thick at the base and 45 feet at the crest, and contains about 3.25 million cubic yards of concrete (roughly 4.4 million cubic yards including appurtenant works). It creates Lake Mead, one of the largest reservoirs in the United States by capacity (historically around 28–32 million acre-feet depending on sedimentation surveys and measurement basis).

Why It Was Built

Hoover Dam takes shape from the concrete columns in which it was poured (shot from cableway control tower downstream on Nevada rim, so looking upstream)
Hoover Dam takes shape from the concrete columns in which it was poured (shot from cableway control tower downstream on Nevada rim, so looking upstream)

In the early 20th century, the Colorado River was both a vital resource and a destructive force for the arid Southwest. Seasonal floods devastated farmland (most dramatically in 1905–1907, when the river broke through irrigation canals and created the Salton Sea in California’s Imperial Valley), while dry periods left water supplies unreliable. Growing cities such as Los Angeles needed dependable municipal water, and the region sought hydroelectric power to support development.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (then the Reclamation Service) saw a large multipurpose dam as the solution: flood control, irrigation water storage and delivery (including via the later All-American Canal to the Imperial and Coachella Valleys), municipal supply, river regulation, and hydropower. Power sales were intended to make the project self-supporting by repaying construction costs. Early advocates included Arthur Powell Davis of the Reclamation Service. Herbert Hoover, as Secretary of Commerce, strongly supported the project and helped resolve interstate water disputes.

A major political obstacle was allocating the river’s water among the seven basin states (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California). Upper Basin states feared Lower Basin (especially California) development would claim most of the water under prior-appropriation rules. In 1922, Hoover chaired negotiations that produced the Colorado River Compact. It divided the basin at Lee Ferry, Arizona, allocating 7.5 million acre-feet annually to each basin (with the Lower Basin allowed an additional 1 million acre-feet under certain conditions) and requiring the Upper Basin not to deplete flows at Lee Ferry below 75 million acre-feet over any 10-year period. Arizona initially refused to ratify; the Compact became effective after six states approved it.

Photograph of the Hoover Dam (formerly Boulder Dam) from Across the Colorado River; From the series Ansel Adams Photographs of National Parks and Monuments, compiled 1941 - 1942, documenting the period ca. 1933 - 1942
Photograph of the Hoover Dam (formerly Boulder Dam) from Across the Colorado River; From the series Ansel Adams Photographs of National Parks and Monuments, compiled 1941 – 1942, documenting the period ca. 1933 – 1942

Congress authorized the project via the Boulder Canyon Project Act, signed by President Calvin Coolidge on December 21, 1928. The Act ratified the Compact (with California limited to 4.4 million acre-feet of the Lower Basin share), authorized the dam and related works (including the All-American Canal), and apportioned Lower Basin water roughly as California 4.4 million acre-feet, Arizona 2.8 million, and Nevada 0.3 million. President Hoover proclaimed the Compact effective in 1929. A later 1944 treaty allocated 1.5 million acre-feet annually to Mexico.

How the Site Was Chosen

Surveys of potential dam sites along the lower Colorado began in the early 1900s. The 1922 Fall-Davis Report recommended a high dam “at or near Boulder Canyon.” Boulder Canyon sites offered strong granite foundations but presented problems: one was crossed by a geologic fault; others were too narrow for construction camps or spillways; accessibility was poorer; and depth to bedrock was greater in places.

Further investigations (including the Weymouth Report) compared Boulder and nearby Black Canyon (about 20 miles downstream). Black Canyon was selected primarily for practical advantages: greater accessibility (a railroad spur could more easily connect from Las Vegas), shallower depth to solid bedrock in key locations, a narrower gorge with steeper walls, lower construction cost for a given height, and somewhat greater reservoir capacity for the same dam height. Geologic conditions were judged adequate (though Boulder’s granite was sometimes rated superior for load-bearing). The project retained the “Boulder Canyon” name even after the site shift. An independent Colorado River Board later confirmed the upper Black Canyon site.

The design chosen was a massive concrete arch-gravity dam (convex upstream face), developed under Bureau engineer John L. Savage and others. It transfers water pressure into the canyon walls while relying on its own weight for stability—an ultra-conservative approach after the 1928 St. Francis Dam failure raised safety concerns.

Construction

Six Companies, Inc. (a joint venture of major contractors including Utah Construction, Bechtel, Kaiser, Morrison-Knudsen, and others) won the contract in March 1931 with a bid of about $48.9 million—the largest U.S. government construction contract to that point. Work began in the spring of 1931 under Bureau construction engineer Walker Young and Six Companies superintendent Frank Crowe.

Key challenges included extreme desert heat, isolation, and the need to divert the entire river. Workers blasted four massive diversion tunnels (two on each side of the river, roughly 56 feet in diameter and totaling several miles in length) through the canyon walls. The river was diverted in November 1932. Cofferdams protected the site; the riverbed was excavated to solid rock; and canyon walls were scaled of loose rock. Concrete placement began June 6, 1933, and the last dam concrete was poured May 29, 1935. Cooling pipes embedded in the concrete controlled the heat of hydration so the massive structure would not crack. The dam began impounding water in February 1935, forming Lake Mead. Power generation started in late 1936. The project finished more than two years ahead of the seven-year contract schedule and was dedicated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on September 30, 1935.

Roughly 21,000 people worked on the project at various times (peak employment over 5,000). Conditions were harsh; official figures record around 96–112 worker deaths from construction accidents (the exact total varies by counting method and whether indirect causes are included). Boulder City was built as a planned community for workers and their families. The dam was initially called Hoover Dam by the Hoover administration, renamed Boulder Dam under Roosevelt, and officially restored as Hoover Dam by Congress in 1947.

The Hoover Damn Bypass Bridge viewed from the Colorado River - Photo by James L Rathbun
The Hoover Damn Bypass Bridge viewed from the Colorado River – Photo by James L Rathbun

Hydropower revenues repaid the federal construction costs decades later. The powerplant (nameplate capacity roughly 2,080 MW after later uprates, with 17 main turbines) has historically supplied electricity to utilities in Arizona, Nevada, and California.

Current Struggles with Low Water

Lake Mead and the broader Colorado River system have been under severe stress from a multi-decade megadrought (intensified by climate change, higher temperatures, and increased evaporation), combined with chronic overuse relative to long-term average flows. The original Compact allocations assumed higher average river flows (around 16–17+ million acre-feet) than the observed long-term average (closer to 14–15 million acre-feet, and significantly lower in recent decades).

As of late August 2026, Lake Mead stood near record-low elevations for the modern period—approximately 1,038.87 feet, about 26% full (storage roughly 6.9 million acre-feet on a ~26 million acre-feet capacity basis used in some daily reporting). This is well below the full-pool elevation of about 1,220 feet and marks new lows relative to recent historical records (surpassing previous lows from 2022 in some metrics). Levels have continued a multi-year decline, with further drops expected until the next major snowmelt runoff.

Low water reduces hydropower generation because lower “head” (water pressure/height above the turbines) decreases output. Capacity falls sharply at lower elevations; generation has already been substantially reduced from historical averages, with further declines projected. Minimum power pool is around 950 feet (with some older turbines limited higher); dead pool (where water can no longer pass the dam by gravity) is about 895 feet. The reservoir remains above these critical thresholds but with a narrowing buffer.

Shortage declarations under existing guidelines have already triggered cuts in Lower Basin deliveries. Federal operating guidelines for 2027–2028 and the post-2026 framework emphasize protecting critical elevations at both Lake Mead and upstream Lake Powell (itself also near or at record lows). Measures include reduced releases from Powell to protect its infrastructure and power generation, mandatory and voluntary reductions in Lower Basin consumptive use (on the order of 1.25 million acre-feet annually plus additional conservation in early years of the new guidelines), and efforts to balance the system. Arizona faces particularly large percentage cuts under priority-based shortage sharing. Power production at Hoover is expected to remain constrained, raising costs for replacement energy and affecting ratepayers.

These challenges highlight the tension between the river’s engineered development (which enabled vast agricultural and urban growth in the Southwest) and the physical limits of a variable, arid basin under climate pressure. Ongoing negotiations among the basin states, tribes, Mexico, and the federal government focus on reducing overall use to match available supply while protecting critical infrastructure and ecosystems.

Hoover Dam remains an engineering landmark, a National Historic Landmark, and a major tourist destination, while continuing to serve its original purposes of flood control, water storage, and power generation—albeit under increasingly constrained hydrologic conditions.

Arthur Powell Davis

Arthur Powell Davis (February 9, 1861 – August 7, 1933)
Arthur Powell Davis (February 9, 1861 – August 7, 1933)

Arthur Powell Davis (February 9, 1861 – August 7, 1933) was an American civil engineer, hydrographer, topographer, and geographer who played a pivotal role in the early 20th-century development of water resources in the American West. As Director of the U.S. Reclamation Service (predecessor to the Bureau of Reclamation) from 1914 to 1923, he was a leading architect of comprehensive federal plans to control and develop the Colorado River. He is widely regarded as a key conceptual founder of the Boulder Canyon Project (which produced Hoover Dam) and broader multipurpose river-basin development.

Early Life and Education

Davis was born on a farm near Decatur, Illinois, the nephew of the famed explorer and geologist John Wesley Powell (leader of the 1869 Colorado River expedition through the Grand Canyon). His family connections and early exposure to the West shaped his career. He attended local schools and Kansas State Normal School before earning a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering from Columbian University (now George Washington University) in Washington, D.C., in 1888.

He married Elizabeth (Preston/Brown) Davis in 1888; they had several daughters. He co-founded the National Geographic Society in 1888 and later held leadership roles in engineering societies. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1921) and the American Philosophical Society (1927).

Early Career with the U.S. Geological Survey

Through his uncle’s influence, Davis joined the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as an assistant topographer around 1882–1884. He worked extensively in the Rocky Mountain region and the Southwest (New Mexico, Arizona, and California), gaining firsthand knowledge of arid lands and the Colorado River Basin. He advanced to topographer and, by 1895, to hydrographer in charge of government stream measurements.

His early international work included hydrographic examinations of potential Nicaragua and Panama Canal routes (late 1890s–early 1900s). He later consulted on irrigation and flood control in Puerto Rico, China, Turkestan (under both Tsarist and Soviet governments), and other regions, and contributed to Panama Canal studies.

Leadership in the Reclamation Service

Davis joined the newly created Reclamation Service (established under the 1902 Reclamation Act) early in its history. He rose to Chief Engineer around 1906–1908 and was appointed Director on December 10, 1914, succeeding Frederick Haynes Newell. He held the post until the agency’s name changed to the Bureau of Reclamation on June 18, 1923; he retired the next day.

Under his leadership the Service built major irrigation and storage works, including the Roosevelt Dam (Salt River), Shoshone and Arrowrock dams (each the world’s tallest at the time of completion), Elephant Butte Dam (Rio Grande), the Gunnison Tunnel, and the Strawberry Tunnel. He was among the first to strongly advocate multipurpose dams in which hydroelectric power generation would help amortize overall project costs—a principle that became central to later federal water development.

Role in Controlling and Developing the Colorado River

Davis’s most enduring contribution was his long-term vision for the Colorado River. Influenced by his uncle’s explorations and his own surveys, he recognized the river’s interstate and international character (flowing through seven U.S. states and into Mexico) and argued that only the federal government could coordinate its development at the necessary scale.

As early as 1902 he publicly called for the “gradual comprehensive development of the Colorado River by a series of large storage reservoirs,” with a high dam on the lower river as the keystone. He promoted basin-wide planning for flood control, irrigation storage, domestic water supply, and power generation rather than fragmented local projects.

In 1922, during his directorship, the Reclamation Service produced the influential report Problems of Imperial Valley and Vicinity (Senate Document 142, 67th Congress), commonly known as the Fall-Davis Report (after Interior Secretary Albert B. Fall and Davis). It examined reservoir sites, justified a high dam in the Boulder Canyon area, analyzed water supply and needs, and provided foundational data used by the Colorado River Compact Commission. The report and Davis’s advocacy helped frame the river’s problems as national in scope and laid groundwork for the Boulder Canyon Project Act and construction of Hoover (originally Boulder) Dam. Contemporaries, including engineers involved in the project, later called him the “father of the Boulder Canyon Project.”

Davis opposed purely local or piecemeal schemes (such as an early standalone All-American Canal proposal) when they conflicted with a coordinated multipurpose federal plan. His emphasis on power revenues to support large storage dams helped make ambitious Colorado River projects financially and politically viable. Shortly before his death he was appointed consulting engineer on the Boulder Dam project. Davis Dam (completed later on the lower Colorado, downstream from Hoover Dam) was named in his honor.

Later Years and Legacy

After leaving the Reclamation Service, Davis served as chief engineer and general manager of the East Bay Municipal Utility District in the Oakland, California, area (roughly 1923–1930). He also worked as a consulting engineer on irrigation projects in the Soviet Union (Turkestan and Transcaucasia) in the early 1930s.

He died in Oakland on August 7, 1933, at age 72 and was buried in Rock Creek Cemetery in Washington, D.C., alongside his wife.

Davis combined technical expertise, bureaucratic skill, and a progressive-era faith in expert-led federal action and efficiency. While he did not live to see Hoover Dam completed, his early vision, surveys, advocacy for multipurpose development, and the Fall-Davis Report were instrumental in transforming the Colorado River from an uncontrolled, flood-prone waterway into a managed system of storage, power, and irrigation infrastructure that shaped the modern American Southwest.