Tag: Mojave Desert

Lost Ship of the Mojave Desert

Posted on by

The legend of lost ships in the Mojave Desert, particularly in California’s Colorado Desert near the Salton Sea, is one of the most enduring and enigmatic tales of the American Southwest. Stories of ancient maritime vessels—often Spanish galleons laden with pearls, gold, or other treasures—stranded in the arid sands have persisted for centuries. These accounts, rooted in Native American oral traditions, Spanish colonial records, and later American folklore, blend historical plausibility with speculative romance. This report examines the historical context, key accounts, and theories surrounding these alleged shipwrecks, assessing their feasibility and cultural significance.

Grok Image of the Lost Ship of the Mojave Desert
Grok Image of the Lost Ship of the Mojave Desert

Historical Context

The Mojave Desert, encompassing parts of Southern California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah, is an unlikely setting for maritime tales. However, the region’s geological and hydrological history provides a plausible backdrop for such legends. The Salton Sea basin, located in the Colorado Desert (a subregion of the Mojave), lies more than 270 feet below sea level and was periodically filled by the Colorado River, creating a vast inland lake known as Lake Cahuilla. Historical records and geological evidence indicate that the Colorado River has repeatedly shifted its course, sometimes flowing into the Gulf of California and at other times flooding the Salton Sink to form Lake Cahuilla. These floods could have created temporary connections to the Gulf, potentially allowing ships to venture inland before becoming stranded as waters receded.

Spanish exploration of the Gulf of California in the 16th and 17th centuries further supports the possibility of ships reaching the region. Explorers like Hernando de Alarcón (1540) and Juan de Iturbe (1615) sailed up the Gulf and, in some cases, the lower Colorado River, seeking treasures, trade routes, or the fabled Straits of Anian—a mythical passage connecting the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The combination of unpredictable river flows, tidal bores, and navigational errors could have led to vessels becoming stranded in the desert.

Key Accounts of Lost Ships

Early Native American and Spanish Reports

Native American oral traditions, particularly among the Cahuilla and other tribes of the region, describe sightings of large “white birds” or ships sailing inland centuries ago. These accounts, recorded as early as the 19th century, suggest encounters with European vessels, possibly Spanish or even earlier visitors. For example, a Cahuilla chief named Cabazon reportedly shared a story in the mid-19th century of a “great white bird” sailing from afar, which some interpret as a reference to a Spanish ship.

Spanish records from the colonial period also hint at lost vessels. One prominent tale involves Juan de Iturbe, a Spanish captain who, in 1615, allegedly sailed a pearl-harvesting caravel up the Gulf of California. According to legend, a high tidal bore carried his ship into Lake Cahuilla, where it became stranded as the lake began to dry. Iturbe and his crew reportedly abandoned the vessel, leaving behind a fortune in black pearls, and trekked back to a Spanish settlement. This story, recounted in Antonio de Fierro Blanco’s 1933 book The Journey of the Flame, is one of the earliest and most detailed accounts of a lost ship.

19th-Century Sightings and Expeditions

Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California
Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California

The legend gained traction in the 19th century, particularly after the Colorado River flood of 1862, which reinvigorated interest in the region’s hydrological history. In 1863, Colonel Albert S. Evans reported seeing a half-buried ship in the desert, describing it as a hulk in a drying alkali marsh west of Dos Palmas, California, about 40 miles north of Yuma, Arizona.

The most famous 19th-century account involves Charley Clusker, a veteran of the Mexican-American War and a seasoned adventurer. In November 1870, Clusker led an expedition from San Bernardino, California, to find a Spanish galleon he believed was buried in the Colorado Desert. The Los Angeles Star reported on November 12, 1870, that Clusker was confident in locating an “ornately carved Spanish galleon, complete with crosses and broken masts,” based on information from local Native Americans. On December 1, the newspaper claimed Clusker’s party had found the ship but had returned to resupply after nearly perishing from dehydration. Clusker set out again but was never heard from thereafter, adding to the legend’s mystique.

20th-Century Reports

In 1933, librarian Myrtle Botts and her husband claimed to have glimpsed a ship in the Anza-Borrego Desert near Canebrake Canyon, based on a prospector’s tip. Botts described seeing a vessel jutting from a canyon wall but was unable to return due to harsh conditions. She believed it was a Viking ship, a theory shared by others, including three UCLA students who mounted an unsuccessful expedition in 1949.

More recent claims include unverified sightings in the 1970s of a smaller vessel, possibly a caravel, near the sand hills west of El Centro, California. Treasure hunters and amateur historians, such as John Grasson, have continued to pursue the legend, often citing shifting sands as a reason for the ship’s elusive nature.

Theories and Hypotheses

Several theories attempt to explain the lost ship legends:

  1. Spanish Galleon Hypothesis: The most popular theory posits that a Spanish galleon, such as Iturbe’s pearl ship or a vessel commissioned by King Philip III in 1610, was carried inland by a tidal bore or flood and stranded in Lake Cahuilla. The ship’s cargo of pearls, gold, or silver fueled treasure-hunting expeditions. This theory is supported by historical Spanish exploration and the region’s hydrological history.
  2. Pirate or English Ship: Some accounts suggest the ship could be Thomas Cavendish’s Content, an English pirate vessel that vanished in the Gulf of California in 1587 after plundering a Spanish galleon. The Content’s captain may have attempted to navigate the Straits of Anian, only to become stranded.
  3. Viking or Pre-Columbian Ship: Less credible theories propose that the ship is a Viking longship or a Phoenician vessel, based on speculative interpretations of Native American stories or artifacts like petroglyphs in Pinto Canyon. These claims lack archaeological evidence and are largely dismissed by scholars.
  4. Modern Misidentification: Some suggest the “lost ship” is a modern vessel, such as a ferry or steamboat abandoned after a Colorado River flood, or a schooner hauled into the desert by gold-seekers and left behind. These explanations account for some sightings but do not explain earlier accounts.
  5. Myth and Mirage: Skeptics argue that the lost ship is a myth perpetuated by mirages, sunstroke-induced hallucinations, or romanticized storytelling. The lack of definitive archaeological evidence supports this view, though the consistency of reports across centuries challenges it.

Feasibility Analysis

The plausibility of a ship in the Mojave Desert hinges on several factors:

  • Hydrological Conditions: Geological evidence confirms that Lake Cahuilla existed intermittently, with paleo-shorelines and fossilized mollusks indicating periodic flooding. A ship could have entered the lake during a high-water event, only to be stranded as the lake dried. The 1906 Colorado River flood, which created the modern Salton Sea, demonstrates the region’s susceptibility to such events.
  • Spanish Exploration: Historical records confirm Spanish voyages into the Gulf of California and up the Colorado River. Hernando de Alarcón reached modern-day Yuma, Arizona, in 1540, approximately 100 miles southeast of the Salton Sea, proving that ships could navigate far inland.
  • Tidal Bores and Floods: The Gulf of California’s powerful tidal bores, combined with Colorado River floods, could have pushed a ship into the Salton Sink. A documented 1922 tidal bore capsized a steamship, killing 86 passengers, illustrating the potential for such events.
  • Archaeological Challenges: The shifting sands of the desert could easily bury or obscure a shipwreck, explaining why no definitive evidence has been found. However, the lack of artifacts, such as cannon shot or ship timbers, weakens the case.

Despite these factors, scholarly skepticism persists. Archaeologist Don Laylander notes that the furthest documented Spanish voyage in the region was Alarcón’s in 1540, with no evidence of ships reaching the Salton Sea. Roberto Junco, an underwater archaeology expert, acknowledges the possibility of an undocumented shipwreck but emphasizes the lack of concrete evidence.

Cultural Significance

The lost ship legend has captured the imagination of generations, appearing in literature, media, and popular culture. Joaquin Miller’s 1875 poem The Ship in the Desert romanticized the tale, while radio shows like Death Valley Days (1940) and television episodes like Bat Masterson’s “The Desert Ship” (1959) brought it to wider audiences. The 2005 film Sahara, featuring a stranded Civil War ship in the desert, may have drawn inspiration from the legend.

The story reflects broader themes of the American West: the allure of treasure, the romance of exploration, and the clash between colonial ambition and indigenous knowledge. It also underscores the human tendency to weave narratives from sparse evidence, as Joan Didion noted: “We tell ourselves stories in order to live.” For treasure hunters like Charley Clusker and modern explorers like John Grasson, the lost ship represents not just wealth but a connection to a mysterious past.

Conclusion

The lost ships of the Mojave Desert remain an unresolved mystery, blending historical plausibility with legendary allure. While geological and historical evidence suggests that a ship could have become stranded in the region, the absence of definitive archaeological proof leaves the story in the realm of folklore. Whether a Spanish galleon, an English pirate ship, or a mirage born of desert heat, the legend continues to inspire curiosity and exploration. Future discoveries, perhaps aided by advanced imaging or fortuitous sand shifts, may yet reveal the truth behind this enduring tale.

Sources

  • DesertUSA.com, “The Lost Ship of the Mojave”
  • AngelFire.com, “The Legend of the Mojave Desert’s Lost Ships”
  • The Desert Sun, “5 Facts About the Lost Ship of the California Desert”
  • AltaOnline.com, “The Lost Galleon of the California Desert”
  • DesertUSA.com, “The Last Voyage of the Content”
  • TheWorldHour.com, “Quest for the Mojave Desert’s Lost Ship”

People Associated with the Lost Ship of the Mojave

Charles Clusker - Day Book (Chicago, IL), 16 June 1913, page 22 - Library of Congress - https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83045487/1913-06-16/ed-1/?sp=22

Charles Clusker

Charles Carroll Clusker (1810–1915) was a Kentucky-born American adventurer, Mexican-American War veteran, prospector, and folk figure best known for his highly publicized but ultimately unsuccessful…
Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California

Colonel Albert S. Evans

Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California Colonel Albert S. Evans (c. 1831–1872) was an American journalist, explorer, author, and adventurer known for his…

Myrtle Botts

Myrtle Botts (likely born in the late 19th or early 20th century; died 1974) was a longtime librarian, local historian, and community figure in Julian,…

Colonel Albert S. Evans

Posted on by
Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California
Colonel Albert S. Evans, from A La California

Colonel Albert S. Evans (c. 1831–1872) was an American journalist, explorer, author, and adventurer known for his colorful accounts of life in the American West, Mexico, and California during the mid-19th century. He wrote under the pen name “Fitz Smythe” and is best remembered today for his vivid travelogues and his role in popularizing the legend of the “Lost Ship of the Desert” (also called the Lost Ship of the Mojave or Colorado Desert).

Early Life and Career

Details about Evans’ early years are sparse. He was born around 1831 (some sources suggest New Hampshire ties). Prior to 1856, he lived in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he worked as a broker. He later moved to Chicago and spent several years working for the Daily Journal. In 1861, amid the excitement of the Gold Rush era and the Civil War period, Evans relocated to San Francisco, California. There, he began a career in journalism with the Morning Call and served on the staff of the Governor of California during the Civil War.

Evans became a prominent figure in San Francisco’s literary and journalistic scene. He served for some years as local editor of the Daily Alta California, a leading newspaper, and feuded publicly with Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) while both were in the city. He was known for his adventurous spirit, exploratory travels, and engaging writing style that blended observation, humor, and drama. Evans was also a friend of New York Herald publisher Horace Greeley.

Major Works

Evans authored two notable travelogues:

  • Our Sister Republic: A Gala Trip through Tropical Mexico in 1869–70 (1870), detailing his journeys in Mexico.
  • A La California: Sketches of Life in the Golden State (1873, published posthumously), a collection of sketches about California life, including desert adventures, which incorporated his earlier writings.

These books were published by A. L. Bancroft of San Francisco and captured the spirit of the American West and borderlands with lively prose.

Involvement in the Search for the Lost Ship of the Mojave/Colorado Desert

Evans’ most enduring contribution to Western folklore stems from his claimed sightings of a mysterious shipwreck in the Colorado Desert (part of the broader Mojave/Colorado Desert region in California), which helped spark the “Lost Ship of the Desert” legend. This tale, one of many desert ship legends, describes a Spanish galleon or other vessel stranded far inland, possibly from the 16th or 17th century, laden with treasure and left behind due to shifting waters or floods of the Colorado River and ancient Lake Cahuilla.

In the autumn of 1863, during a period of intense gold and copper mining rushes across the Colorado Desert toward Arizona, Evans and a companion (Uncle Billy Thompson) took a “short cut” from San Gorgonio Pass eastward. They became lost, endured severe dehydration and hardship on the scorching sands and adobe mountains, and survived thanks to a small water deposit from a recent cloudburst. After reaching safety and later venturing into Arizona, Evans made a return trip. His horse, the faithful buckskin steed “Muchacho Juan,” died from eating poisonous desert weed near Dos Palmas (in the area of the modern Salton Sink). Evans continued on foot alone toward San Bernardino.

In his account “In the Valley of the Shadow” (published in The Galaxy magazine, January 1870, and later reprinted in A La California), Evans described walking westward from Dos Palmas across a vast, desolate playa (dry lakebed) under moonlight. He recounted seeing, far out in the center of what appeared as a “ghostly sea” of salt and alkali:

“Southward to the very horizon stretched a great plain of snowy salt, the white ghost of a dead sea which once covered all this accursed land but has passed away forever. Right in this burning pathway of light, far out in the center of the ghostly sea, where foot of man had never trod, lay in the distance the wreck of a gallant ship, which might have gone down there centuries ago, when the bold Spanish adventurers were pushing their way to the northwest in search of the fabled treasures of the famed Kingdom of Cibola.”

He portrayed the moon casting a shimmering track of light on the half-buried hulk, with masts or ribs visible like those of a “mighty monster.” Evans claimed this was not a mirage and later stated he had seen the ship on two occasions. The location was roughly west of Dos Palmas, near Palma Seca (also called Soda Springs or similar), about 100 miles or more from the sea in an alkali marsh or saline lakebed.

His published story in 1870 ignited widespread interest. Newspapers like the Los Angeles Daily News, Sacramento Union, and others reported on the wreck, describing it as a teak-built vessel visible from mesas. Expeditions, including one led by Charley Clusker from San Bernardino, set out to find it, but searchers returned empty-handed or with inconclusive results. Some theories suggested it was an optical illusion, a ferryboat or schooner hauled by oxen that broke down, or remnants from Colorado River floods. The legend persisted, with later variations linking it to Spanish pearl ships (e.g., Juan de Iturbe’s vessel) or pirate treasure. Today, much of the area is under the Salton Sea, making searches difficult.

Evans’ account stood out for its firsthand detail and literary flair, helping transform a regional rumor into a lasting American folklore staple, later inspiring poems (e.g., by Joaquin Miller) and further searches.

Death

Colonel Albert S. Evans died on October 22, 1872, at sea aboard the steamship Missouri, which burned during its passage from New York toward Havana. He perished in the disaster along with other passengers. His book A La California was published posthumously the following year.

Evans embodied the restless, adventurous spirit of the 19th-century American West—a journalist who lived the stories he told, from desert ordeals to political feuds and international travels. While his desert ship sighting remains unverified and likely exaggerated or misperceived (common in mirage-prone deserts), it cemented his place in California and Southwestern lore.

Charles Clusker

Posted on by

Charles Carroll Clusker (1810–1915) was a Kentucky-born American adventurer, Mexican-American War veteran, prospector, and folk figure best known for his highly publicized but ultimately unsuccessful 1870 expeditions in search of the legendary “Lost Ship of the Desert” (also associated with the Salton Sink or Salton Sea basin) in California’s Colorado Desert.

Charles Clusker - Day Book (Chicago, IL), 16 June 1913, page 22 - Library of Congress - https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83045487/1913-06-16/ed-1/?sp=22
Charles Clusker – Day Book (Chicago, IL), 16 June 1913, page 22 – Library of Congress – https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83045487/1913-06-16/ed-1/?sp=22

Early Life and Background

Born on March 27, 1810, in Madison County, Kentucky, Clusker grew up in the early American frontier era. Details of his youth are sparse, but like many of his generation, he was drawn westward by opportunities for adventure and fortune. He served as a veteran of the Mexican-American War (1846–1848), which likely exposed him to the Southwest and California territories.

After the war, Clusker migrated to California during or following the Gold Rush period. He was described as a lifelong adventurer and prospector who had come to the state years earlier seeking gold. By the late 1860s/early 1870s, he was based in the San Bernardino area of Southern California, where he gained a local reputation for veracity and sense, according to contemporary newspaper accounts.

He lived a long life, dying on October 25, 1915, at age 105 in San Diego, California. He is buried in Greenwood Memorial Park in San Diego, in the Elks Rest plot, with an inscription noting his affiliation with the San Bernardino Lodge No. 836 B.P.O. Elks (suggesting community ties in that area).

Life as an Adventurer and Prospector

Clusker embodied the archetype of the 19th-century Western prospector and explorer—restless, hardy, and willing to endure extreme hardship in pursuit of riches or legends. Post-Mexican War, he joined the waves of migrants and miners flooding into California. His later fame (or notoriety) stemmed from treasure-hunting expeditions rather than major mining successes. He appears to have been known locally in San Bernardino as a credible figure, which lent weight to his claims when he announced discoveries.

Little is documented about his personal life, family, or other activities beyond his military service, prospecting, and the ship expedition. His advanced age at death indicates remarkable resilience, having survived the rigors of frontier life, desert expeditions, and the Civil War era.

The Search for the Lost Ship of the Salton Sink (Detailed Report)

The “Lost Ship of the Desert” (sometimes called the Lost Galleon or associated with the Salton Sink/Salton Sea basin) is a persistent legend of a Spanish treasure vessel (often described as a pearl-laden galleon or caravel commanded by Juan de Iturbe around 1615) that supposedly sailed up the Colorado River or was carried by a tidal bore/flood into the inland Salton Sink (an ancient lake bed, now partially the Salton Sea) and became stranded far from the sea. Native American stories, Spanish-era tales, and later sightings fueled the myth, with the ship said to contain pearls, treasures, ornate carvings, crosses, and broken masts, often half-buried in sand or mud near areas like Dos Palmas.

Clusker’s involvement in 1870 became one of the most prominent chapters in this legend, generating newspaper coverage and public excitement before fading into obscurity.

Timeline and Events of Clusker’s Expeditions (1870):

  • Lead-up and Initial Expedition: Inspired by Indian reports and regional lore placing the ship roughly 30–50 miles west of Dos Palmas (northeast of the Salton Sea basin) in areas of alkali marshes, boiling mud springs, or shifting sands, Clusker organized a party. He had previously made a trip a few weeks earlier but encountered difficulties (e.g., miring his wagon).
  • November 12, 1870: The Los Angeles Star reported that “Charley Clusker and a party started out again this morning to find the mythical ship upon the desert this side of Dos Palmas.” He was equipped with a good wagon, pack saddles, and planks for crossing sandy ground, demonstrating preparation for the harsh terrain.
  • The Claimed Discovery: According to reports, Clusker and his party endured severe hardships, including running out of water and food. He claimed to have located an ornately carved Spanish galleon, mostly buried in the sand, with crosses and broken masts, in a remote region far from water (described as 50 miles or more from Dos Palmas in an area of boiling mud springs). He reportedly nearly perished from dehydration under the “hot broiling sun” for over 24 hours but returned to civilization.
  • December 1, 1870: Newspapers like the San Bernardino Guardian excitedly announced success: “Charley Clusker and party returned from the desert yesterday… They had a hard time of it, but they have succeeded in their effort. The ship has been found! Charley returns to the desert today, to reap the fruition of his labors.” The Daily Alta California vouched for his credibility: “Mr. Clusker stands high in this community for veracity and sense. He certainly believes he has found the SHIP, and every one here believes him. He starts to-morrow again, taking several barrels for water.”
  • Follow-up and Failure: Clusker returned to the site with renewed supplies but could not relocate the ship. Subsequent reports indicate the party (including members like Joshua Talbot) returned without success. By January 1871, the San Bernardino Guardian noted the return of the prospectors without the ship. Clusker largely disappeared from the public record afterward, much like the elusive vessel itself. No treasure or verifiable wreck was recovered.

Context and Evaluation: Clusker’s claims fit the pattern of many “lost ship” sightings—brief glimpses, difficult conditions preventing thorough documentation, and subsequent failure to rediscover due to shifting sands, mirages, or exaggeration. Historians and skeptics suggest possible explanations like optical illusions, abandoned wagons/ferry boats (e.g., mule-hauled craft from earlier efforts), or deliberate embellishment for a “grubstake” (funding). Harold O. Weight’s 1977 article in Desert Magazine (“Charley Clusker and the lost ship”) explored this, noting it as a potential way to secure support for further prospecting.

The legend persisted with later claimed sightings (e.g., by Myrtle Botts in the 1930s), but no conclusive physical evidence has emerged. Modern factors like the Salton Sea’s formation (1905–1907) and military land use have complicated searches. Clusker’s effort remains a colorful example of how frontier folklore blended hope, hardship, and hype in the American West.

Legacy

Clusker is remembered primarily through the Lost Ship legend in books, articles, documentaries (Myth Hunters), and online discussions. He symbolizes the enduring allure of desert mysteries and the risks of treasure hunting. His long life and brief fame highlight the blend of fact and myth in California’s pioneer history. While he found no ship or fortune, his story endures as part of the rich tapestry of Southwestern tall tales.

Epsom Salts Monorail

Posted on by

The Epsom Salts Monorail (also known as the Magnesium Monorail) was a short-lived but remarkable engineering experiment in the remote Mojave Desert of San Bernardino County, California.

Camp of the Epsom Salts Monorail
Camp of the Epsom Salts Monorail

It operated as a Lartigue-type monorail from 1924 to 1926, spanning approximately 28 miles (45 km) to transport epsomite (hydrated magnesium sulfate, commonly called Epsom salts) from a deposit in the Owlshead Mountains (near the Crystal Hills and southern edge of Death Valley) to a siding on the Trona Railway at Magnesia (about six miles south of Trona, near Searles Lake).

This was one of the few commercial monorails ever built in the United States and briefly gained fame as the “fastest monorail in the world” due to its downhill speeds. However, it proved economically unviable and was abandoned after just two years of operation.

Discovery and Early Development (1917–1922)

In 1917, prospectors discovered a deposit of magnesium salts in the multicolored badlands of the Crystal Hills, a rugged area of low ridges and ravines in northwestern San Bernardino County, roughly 28 miles east of Searles Lake and near the old Wingate Wash Borax Road. The site lay in desolate desert terrain between Wingate Valley, the Panamint Range, and areas visible from Death Valley—virtually uninhabited and far from infrastructure.

Los Angeles florist Thomas Wright acquired the mining claims in 1919. Initially, he and his team hauled supplies over punishing 40–63-mile dirt tracks from Randsburg (a journey plagued by broken springs, overheating engines, and rough terrain). Wright envisioned exploiting the epsomite for pharmaceutical and industrial uses but faced major transport challenges.

A plan to dissolve the salts and pump them via a 28-mile pipeline to the Trona Railway was abandoned due to insufficient water. Traditional narrow-gauge rail or road grading proved prohibitively expensive in the steep, rocky canyons and unstable lake beds. In 1921–1922, Wright formed the American Magnesium Company and opted for a monorail system—specifically an adaptation of the French Lartigue monorail design, which used a single elevated rail and balancing outriggers for stability in challenging terrain.

Construction began in late 1922 at Magnesia Siding on the Trona Railway. Douglas fir timber was shipped by sea to San Pedro, then railed to the site. A prototype was built, and a patent secured on June 23, 1923.

Engineering and Construction (1922–1924)

The monorail was a custom timber-and-steel adaptation of the Lartigue system. A central 4×6-inch or 6×8-inch wooden “riding beam” (supported by A-frame trestles spaced about 8 feet apart) carried a standard T-section steel rail (mostly 80 lb/yd, some lighter). The A-frames featured diagonal braces, horizontal crosspieces, and 2×6-inch side balancing boards or rails for stabilizing rollers. Bents were anchored to broad sills sunk into sand and gravel, with extra bracing over arroyos. The entire structure rose only a few feet off the ground in most places.

The route climbed dramatically: it crossed the dry bed of Searles Lake in long tangents, ascended through Layton Canyon in the Slate Range (gaining 1,800 feet over 5 miles at a 7% grade), crossed Layton Pass (summit ~3,501 ft / 1,067 m), descended into Panamint Valley (with one road overpass creating a roller-coaster effect), climbed steeply (10–12% grades) over Wingate Pass, and followed Wingate Wash and Crystal Hills Wash to the mine. Blasting was required in hard-rock sections.

Construction took two years and cost an estimated $200,000–$350,000 (sources vary on the exact figure). By September 1923, half the line was complete. The monorail opened in June 1924.

Operation and Brief Success (1924–1926)

Rolling stock consisted of steel-framed locomotives and carriages with double-flanged wheels riding the central rail and spring-suspended steel rollers (8 inches high and wide) on the side boards for balance. Loads hung low in saddlebag-like containers on either side, keeping the center of gravity stable (much like pack saddles on a mule). Couplings came from scrapped Los Angeles streetcars. Brakes were locomotive-only.

Initially battery-powered units proved underpowered; the company modified seven Fordson tractors and one heavier Buda tractor into articulated monorail locomotives (each handling 1–2 trailers, or up to 3,400 lb per loco and 8,500 lb per car). A small workforce (12–15 men at the mine) scraped high-grade epsomite from surface deposits using basic tools.

Trains operated at normal speeds of 8–15 mph uphill/flats but reached up to 35 mph (56 km/h) downhill. One engineer famously completed a fully loaded 28–30-mile run in about one hour, earning the line its “fastest monorail in the world” nickname (though he was reportedly fired for the reckless speed). Salt was sacked at the mine, railed to Magnesia Siding, then shipped by standard rail to a refining plant in Wilmington, California, for processing into Epsom salts, Glauber’s salt, and magnesium carbonate.

Challenges, Decline, and Closure

Despite the engineering novelty, the operation faced insurmountable problems. High-grade surface epsomite depleted quickly, leaving lower-quality ore contaminated with up to 50% sand, clay, and other salts. Wooden beams warped as they dried in the desert heat, causing misalignment. Cloudbursts and flash floods washed out sections (especially near Layton Pass and on Searles Lake bed, where up to 14 inches of water softened sediments). Landslides and uneven settling further damaged the track. Locomotives and brakes were inadequate for sustained heavy loads, and maintenance was costly.

Output fell far short of estimates. Intense competition from cheaper brine-based magnesium producers doomed the venture. The mine and monorail shut down in June 1926 (some accounts cite 1927), after transporting only modest tonnages over two years. The American Magnesium Company was liquidated with minimal recovery of investment.

Aftermath and Legacy (1930s–Present)

The monorail stood idle for about a decade. In the late 1930s, the steel rail and longitudinal timbers were salvaged and sold for scrap. Only scattered A-frames remained, many later used as firewood, removed, or scattered by floods; most have since disappeared.

Today, the largest surviving sections lie in restricted military areas of the China Lake Naval Air Weapons Center (Range B). The mine site itself is within Death Valley National Park and accessible via Fort Irwin National Training Center near Tecopa (with permits). Concrete foundations, salt piles, and house ruins persist at the old camp. A historical marker (erected 2008 by E Clampus Vitus and the Bureau of Land Management) stands near SR-178 and Pinnacle Road, about 16 miles east of Ridgecrest.

The Epsom Salts Monorail remains a classic example of desert mining ambition and engineering ingenuity in the face of harsh geography. It highlighted the limits of wooden infrastructure in extreme environments and the economic realities of remote mineral extraction. Though a commercial failure, its innovative design and brief “world’s fastest” reputation continue to fascinate historians of unusual railways.

For further reading, see Alexander K. Rogers’ book The Epsom Salts Monorail: The American Magnesium Company Monorail in San Bernardino County, California (Maturango Museum) and Richard H. Jahns’ 1951 article “Epsom Salts Line—Monorail to Nowhere” in Engineering and Science.

Desert Chicory (Rafinesquia neomexicana)

Posted on by

Desert Chicory (Rafinesquia neomexicana), also known as New Mexico plumeseed or plumeseed, is a delicate annual wildflower native to the arid deserts of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. This grayish-green plant features sparse foliage, weak zigzag stems that often climb through or lean on nearby shrubs for support, and exudes a milky sap when broken. Its basal leaves are pinnately lobed with narrow segments, while upper leaves are smaller and reduced. The most striking feature is its large, showy white flower heads—resembling dandelion-like blooms with strap-shaped ray florets often tinged with faint purplish streaks on the undersides—blooming in spring (typically March to May or June) after sufficient winter rains, brightening sandy or gravelly desert landscapes in habitats like creosote bush scrub and Joshua tree woodlands.

Desert Chicory (Rafinesquia neomexicana)
Desert Chicory (Rafinesquia neomexicana)

Scientific Taxonomy and Categorization

Scientific Name: Rafinesquia neomexicana A. Gray Common Names: Desert Chicory, New Mexico Plumeseed, California Chicory, Desert Chickory

Taxonomic Hierarchy (based on standard botanical classification):

  • Kingdom: Plantae (Plants)
  • Clade: Tracheophytes (Vascular plants)
  • Clade: Angiosperms (Flowering plants)
  • Clade: Eudicots
  • Clade: Asterids
  • Order: Asterales
  • Family: Asteraceae (Aster or Sunflower family; also known as the daisy family)
  • Genus:Rafinesquia
  • Species:Rafinesquia neomexicana

This species belongs to the tribe Cichorieae within Asteraceae (the chicory tribe), characterized by flower heads composed entirely of ligulate (strap-shaped) ray florets with milky sap — traits shared with common chicory (Cichorium intybus) and dandelions. It is a native annual herbaceous forb (herb), completing its life cycle in one season from a taproot. It is not a true chicory but earns the common name from its superficial resemblance to chicory flowers. Synonyms include Nemoseris neomexicana.

Detailed Plant Description

Desert Chicory is a delicate, grayish-green annual forb growing 6–24 inches (15–61 cm) tall, typically reaching up to 2 feet. The stems are weak, purplish at the base, zigzag-shaped, glabrous (completely hairless), and often climb or lean on neighboring shrubs for support. All parts exude a milky sap when broken. Leaves are sparse and alternate along the stems: lower (basal) leaves are larger (2–8 inches or 5–20 cm long), pinnately lobed with narrow, teeth-like lobes; upper leaves are reduced to small, bract-like appendages. The entire plant has a sparse, upright appearance adapted for arid conditions.

Detailed Flower Description

The showy, bright white flower heads measure about 1½ inches (3.8 cm) across and appear solitary or in small clusters at the tips of branches. Each head consists exclusively of ligulate ray florets (no central disk florets), giving it a dandelion- or chicory-like appearance. The rays are strap-shaped, with 5 small teeth at the tips and often purplish streaks or veins on the undersides or midribs. The phyllaries (bracts enclosing the head) are ½–1 inch (1.5–2.5 cm) long and feature purple-streaked midribs. Flowers open in response to adequate winter rainfall and close at night or in cloudy weather. The overall effect is a starburst of pure white against the desert backdrop.

Fruit: A cypsela (achene) with a pappus of dark gray bristles (hence “plumeseed”).

Habitat

Desert Chicory thrives in arid, dry-climate environments with sandy, gravelly, or rocky well-drained soils. It is commonly found in creosote bush scrub, Joshua tree woodland, arid plains, mesas, bajadas, moderate slopes, washes, and lower desert flats. It often grows nestled among or supported by other desert shrubs. Elevation range: 200–4,500 feet (61–1,067 m), primarily in lower to upper desert zones.

Range and Distribution

Native Range: Southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico.

  • U.S. States: Arizona (AZ), California (CA), Nevada (NV), New Mexico (NM), Texas (TX), Utah (UT).
  • Mexico: Northern and central Baja California, Sonora.

It occurs across the Mojave Desert and Sonoran Desert (including the Colorado Desert subregion). In California, it is native and found in creosote bush scrub and Joshua tree woodland communities. Distribution is concentrated in southeastern California, southern Nevada, and central/western/northeastern Arizona. It is absent from the eastern United States (where “Carolina desert-chicory” refers to the unrelated Pyrrhopappus carolinianus).

Phenology and Ecology

Bloom Period: February–June (primarily March–May), peaking as a conspicuous spring bloomer following adequate winter rainfall.

Ecologically, it provides nectar and pollen for butterflies, moths, native bees, and other insects. Seeds and plants may attract hummingbirds, rodents, granivorous birds, and even red-eared blister beetles (which feed on petals). It is an important early-season wildflower in desert ecosystems. Similar species include Rafinesquia californica (smaller heads, more restricted in Arizona) and Calycoseris wrightii (tackstem, with glandular herbage).

This native desert annual plays a key role in post-rainfall displays across the Southwest, including areas around Las Vegas, Nevada, where it brightens sandy washes and slopes each spring.